Competition Execution Playbook
Development playbook for keeping product, demo, docs, proof, and UX aligned with the active competition targets.
Boundary
Execution guidance only; it does not by itself upgrade the repo beyond what is actually implemented.
Audience: Founders, operators, product leads, reviewers
Open raw fileCompetition Execution Playbook
This playbook keeps PrivateDAO aligned with the active Frontier and Superteam tracks without drifting into inaccurate claims or random feature work.
It is complementary to `frontier-competition-readiness-2026.md`:
- `frontier-competition-readiness-2026.md` answers: which tracks matter most and why
- `competition-execution-playbook.md` answers: how development should stay aligned with those tracks
It should now also be read with:
- `colosseum-frontier-2026-operating-brief.md`
because the April 2026 Frontier cycle changed the operating baseline around:
- product impact
- signer and governance security
- migration discipline
- runtime and incident posture
Non-negotiable constraints
- Do not weaken the protocol story to chase a trend.
- Do not touch the contracts or protocol layout unless explicitly required.
- Do not overstate audit, custody, or mainnet readiness.
- Do not claim encrypted AI, partner integrations, or operational support that is not already real.
- Do not frame PrivateDAO as "audit-complete therefore safe"; after Drift, operating posture must remain visible.
Always preserve these foundations
- `ZK`
- `REFHE`
- `MagicBlock`
- `Fast RPC`
- `Governance Hardening V3`
- `Settlement Hardening V3`
- `Live proof`
- `Live proof V3`
- `Mainnet blockers`
These are not optional decorations. They are the differentiation layer.
Product-level priorities
1. Privacy-first strength
Push hardest where PrivateDAO is naturally strongest:
- private voting
- reviewer-visible proof
- confidential operations
- additive hardening
- explicit trust boundaries
2. RPC and infrastructure strength
Keep investing in:
- hosted reads
- diagnostics
- runtime evidence
- API-facing surfaces
- operator and buyer packaging
2b. Operating-security strength
Keep reinforcing:
- signer posture
- timelock visibility
- explicit launch blockers
- wallet runtime honesty
- durable-nonce-aware security framing
- STRIDE-style operational maturity
3. Consumer and wallet strength
Keep improving:
- wallet onboarding
- route clarity
- mobile and Android affordances
- simpler first-run decisions
4. Competition clarity
Each surface should answer one of these quickly:
- what is PrivateDAO?
- why is it hard to copy?
- what is already live?
- what still needs external completion?
- why does this fit the target track?
Required surface consistency
If the product story changes, consider whether the same change must appear in:
- Next.js route structure
- `/story`
- `/start`
- `/tracks`
- `/tracks/[slug]`
- `/services`
- `/command-center`
- `/security`
- curated documents
- README
- demo and deck materials
Default implementation bias
When multiple improvements are possible, prefer this order:
- better live UX
- cleaner operational routing
- stronger wallet-first experience
- stronger operating-security readability
- stronger reviewer readability
- stronger track-specific positioning
- only then add new speculative corridors
Track-specific emphasis
Privacy Track
Lead with:
- `PrivateDAO Core`
- `Gaming DAO Corridor`
- `ZK Capability Matrix`
- `Cryptographic Confidence Engine`
RPC credits track
Lead with:
- `Read API + RPC`
- diagnostics
- hosted read surfaces
Consumer Apps
Lead with:
- cleaner navigation
- clearer onboarding
- `/start`
- command center
- wallet-first interaction
Eitherway / live dApp
Lead with:
- real wallet UX
- live operational flow
- infrastructure partner corridor
- story video, `/start`, and wallet-first track workspace
Colosseum Frontier main judging posture
Lead with:
- product impact
- startup-grade polish
- visible operating discipline
- proof and trust continuity
- security posture that survives the post-Drift environment
Ranger / 100xDevs
Lead with:
- integrated product coherence
- polished operational shell
- evidence-backed readiness
Validation
For competition-facing frontend work, finish with:
cd /home/x-pact/PrivateDAO/apps/web
npm run lint
npm run build
cd /home/x-pact/PrivateDAO
npm run web:bundle:root
npm run web:publish:root
npm run web:verify:live:root
npm run verify:submission-registry
npm run verify:test-wallet-live-proof:v3If the work touched reviewer or proof surfaces, also verify the relevant docs and generated artifacts remain consistent.