PrivateDAO Engineering Integration Reports Index

Date: 2026-06-11 Audience: protocol engineers, integration teams, security reviewers, judges, investors Repository snapshot reviewed: origin/main at 7fb1025ff064c8c83efb2c59ce07ec780964c450 Project posture: Solana Testnet product with wallet-first public verification, provider-router intelligence, privacy execution lanes, and hosted read-node proof routes.

Purpose

This index organizes the engineering reports for PrivateDAO's intelligence, privacy, encryption, treasury, asset, oracle, infrastructure, telemetry, and provider integrations.

The reports follow the same discipline as the MagicBlock protocol report:

• cite repository surfaces rather than marketing slogans
• separate current Testnet/runtime evidence from future protocol-deepening work
• explain why each integration exists in the product
• show the operational boundary and proof route where available
• make hidden complexity inspectable for reviewers without pushing that complexity into the first-user UX

Product Spine

PrivateDAO's public flow remains:

Connect -> Intelligence -> Private Vote -> Reveal -> Verify -> Execute

The integration reports explain what happens beneath that flow:

Wallet/user action
  -> proposal or room context
  -> intelligence and asset checks before signing
  -> private coordination and hidden influence signals during voting
  -> commit/reveal, ZK, REFHE, Ika/Encrypt, payout, or treasury boundary
  -> Solana Testnet proof, read-node receipt, provider health, or public audit packet

Report Map

Integration Coverage

Verification Discipline

These reports use the following evidence classes:

• on-chain: Solana Testnet signatures, account ownership, PDA state, executable program state, token account state.
• read-node receipt: API response from api.privatedao.org showing runtime state, indexed proof, provider status, or telemetry.
• provider health: upstream or wrapped provider status endpoint that proves the integration boundary is reachable or correctly disabled.
• repository proof: code, tests, generated documents, scripts, and local verification commands.
• sandbox boundary: deterministic fallback used when external provider credentials are intentionally absent.

When evidence classes differ, the report uses the strongest true label and explicitly marks weaker lanes as sandbox, optional, placeholder, or roadmap.