Product navigation
This lecture covers the full governance lifecycle in UI form: DAO creation, proposal drafting, commit-reveal voting, voice-assisted inputs, proof-linked execution, and status visibility.
What this lecture turns into in the product
This lecture covers the full governance lifecycle in UI form: DAO creation, proposal drafting, commit-reveal voting, voice-assisted inputs, proof-linked execution, and status visibility.
Run one governance cycle now
Use the real Govern surface to draft, commit, reveal, and execute from the same product lane, then open Judge to inspect the recorded signatures and proof corridor.
- • Create or review a DAO proposal in Govern.
- • Commit a vote, then continue into reveal and execution when the stage is available.
- • Open Judge and Proof to inspect the signatures, lifecycle state, and captured evidence.
How to build a proposal panel, vote controls, reveal and execute states, and voice-assisted commands while preserving the signer boundary and privacy posture.
Governance UX collapses when voting intent leaks too early or when execution feels like a protocol-debugging ceremony. Users need lifecycle visibility without losing privacy or fairness.
PrivateDAO keeps the entire path in Govern and the workbench: create DAO, draft proposal, commit vote, reveal later, execute, and then inspect the blockchain evidence in Judge and Proof.
Open Govern, use typed or voice-assisted commands, create a proposal, run the vote lifecycle, then inspect the resulting signatures on the judge path.
Focus on the govern page, workbench client, and the voice command panel. Those files show how normal-language interaction becomes structured governance actions before the wallet signs.
Build a proposal card that can move through create, vote, reveal, and execute states while keeping the user aware of privacy and signer boundaries.
- • Proposal card with state badges
- • Commit vote action and reveal action
- • Execution status and proof entry CTA
- A)It protects vote intent until the right proof stage.Correct
- B)It removes the need for wallet signatures.
- C)It replaces runtime logs.
- A)It reduces friction while keeping the final signer boundary intact.Correct
- B)It executes on-chain actions without wallet approval.
- C)It hides every governance state from the user.
- A)Create, vote, reveal, execute, and final verification state.Correct
- B)Only the final execute button.
- C)Only backend logs and raw account data.
- A)Because the cryptographic boundary still matters even when the UI is simple.Correct
- B)Because commit-reveal is not compatible with signatures.
- C)Because Solana wallets cannot sign governance actions.
- A)Open verification or proof and inspect the resulting signatures and status.Correct
- B)Close the app because governance is finished.
- C)Hide the outcome until mainnet.